Southern River Hockey Club
Ladders
| Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | Forfeits | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Mods-OGM 4 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 3 | 29 | 18 | 100% |
| 2. WASPS 3 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 6 | 24 | 18 | 100% |
| 3. Newman Knights 2 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 14 | 78% |
| 4. Whitford 2 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 10 | 56% |
| 5. NC Raiders 3 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 56% |
| 6. Joondalup Lakers | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 10 | 56% |
| 7. Westside Wolves | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 7 | 39% |
| 8. Fremantle Cockburn 3 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 7 | 39% |
| 9. Roleystone | 6 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 15 | -10 | 6 | 33% |
| 10. Southern River 2 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 13 | -9 | 5 | 28% |
| 11. Mods-OGM 3 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 18 | -13 | 5 | 28% |
| 12. Uni Associates 5 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 15 | -11 | 4 | 22% |
| 13. BHF Dragons | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 17 | -14 | 4 | 22% |
| 14. Southern River 3 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 16 | -14 | 1 | 6% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.
Sponsors
We Support
