Ladders
Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | Forfeits | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Mods-OGM 6 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 6 | 22 | 19 | 90% |
2. UWA 9 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 15 | 71% |
3. Canning | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 25 | 16 | 9 | 15 | 71% |
4. Melville 6 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 11 | 61% |
5. WASPS 6 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 10 | 56% |
6. Southern River 3 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 20 | 13 | 7 | 10 | 48% |
7. Rockingham 3 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 17 | -11 | 7 | 33% |
8. Reds 7 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 12 | -9 | 5 | 24% |
9. Kalamunda 3 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 27 | -23 | 5 | 24% |
10. Curtin University 5 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 24 | -22 | 0 | 0% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.