Ladders
Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | Forfeits | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. UWA 4 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 9 | 23 | 21 | 100% |
2. Melville 4 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 26 | 10 | 16 | 16 | 76% |
3. Southern River | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 23 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 62% |
4. Newman Knights 2 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 17 | 19 | -2 | 13 | 62% |
5. Uni Associates | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 22 | 12 | 10 | 12 | 57% |
6. Joondalup Lakers 2 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 13 | 20 | -7 | 10 | 48% |
7. WASPS 4 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 19 | 20 | -1 | 9 | 43% |
8. Mods-OGM 4 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 15 | -9 | 4 | 19% |
9. Lions 2 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 8 | 24 | -16 | 3 | 14% |
10. Curtin University 3 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 29 | -26 | 1 | 5% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.